Awaiting reviewer assignment after major revision sample reddit. 21, awaiting AE decision.
Awaiting reviewer assignment after major revision sample reddit However, now in August the status of the manuscript has remained "Awaiting EIC decision" for more than a few days. 12 Pre-accepted Translation: 5. I was wondering about the chances of the manuscript being Nov 5, 2019 · However, finally he/she seems to have found the requisite number of reviewers and sent out review invitations to them. Jul 12, 2023 · 三三三三三三 2023-07-12 March 10, 2023, submission. 7 Awaiting Editorial Official Checklist 11. There is no need for anonymising the manuscript upon A major revision would normally go back to the same reviewers and they would usually have as much time to review as the original submission. The comments were entirely new. Is the reviewer complaining about the same things as in the first time? If yes, maybe should just focus on these points and try to convince him/her. ” I had this with one paper (Medical Care) and I think I had two of these rejections before the minor formatting revision pre-acceptance (longest submission process in my career; one year from first submission to acceptance). 审稿人可能暂时不可用：原审稿人有 The initial peer reviews pointed out some flaws, so we were invited to submit a major revision. The title says it all. It is almost 5 months since resubmission, but the status has remained “Awaiting Reviewer Selection” since then. A third reason for inviting new referees might be a reject from the final reviewer after your minor revision (assuming the editor had send it out again). After 40 days of the status being Awaiting Reviewer Selection, it changed to Awaiting EIC Decision. After 2 months of peer review process, the response was “moderate revision has been requested” and they told me that the new version is As an analogy, say that you are at a cookery school, and the student uses shop-bought pastry in his ravioli assignment. 14, awaiting reviewer selection. This change has occurred Mar 5, 2019 · I resubmitted a major revision approximately a month ago to a social science journal. The first reviewer stated that if the article is re-written, it could be published. Jul 9, 2019 · I have submitted a paper in a journal's special issue. My paper has been submitted for more than 15 months in one of the IEEE transactions. 15-6. Aug 21, 2023 · 论文小修后await. I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again May 1, 2021 · I submitted a manuscript to a journal by SAGE. After submitting the minor revision, the status changed to under review and pending approval. This change has occurred Then after submiting the minor revisions and waiting for two months I got major revision request and I was shocked. Aug 3, 2021 · Dear Team, First, thank you for running such a stunning forum. 2 days ago · Peer review is an integral part of the publishing process, learn more about the peer review process, including: what the reviewer is looking for, the possible outcomes of peer review, common reasons for rejection, what to do if your manuscript is rejected, and how to respond to the reviewer comments. Awaiting Reviewer Assignment: Review and Revision Time for Manuscripts Submitted to Aug 4, 2021 · After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Some journals have this weird category “reject with invitation to resubmit,” which functions as an alternative to “major revisions. What the Hell?! What does it mean if after 6 weeks the status "Awaiting Reviewer Scores" Major revision in June 2023 (accepted by reviewers 3-4, reviewer 5 is nowhere to be found, a new reviewer 6 rejects the submission) Reviewer 6 said that this whole category of methods is not valid. This status change occurs approximately every few days. Minor Revision. Did you not just answer your own question with the last sentence? If an ACADEMIC paper published in an ACADEMIC JOURNAL is so poor that you question if it would even pass as a high school term paper, there are immediate concerns about peer review policy. I also expressed my concerns that the terminology used in the paper diverged from the commonly used terminology Understand the journal and case study peer review process and read our tips for revising your submission. Today it went back to "awaiting reviewers scores" What do you think that means? [email protected] Submitted my paper. a) Is it possible to be rejected at this point? Oct 1, 2012 · In my field (chemistry), the practice is: for those journals that make a clear distinction between minor and major revision requests, “major revision” means that the paper will have to undergo further review after revision, usually by the same referees, while “minor revision” means that while changes should be made, no further reviewing is needed. " However, if one or more reviewers decline the review invitation, the editor has to look for other reviewers. " After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Mar 13, 2022 · After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. What does this mean? Was the manuscript reviewed? I think the status should have changed to something like Awaiting Reviewer Scores before Awaiting EIC Decision. Aug 24, 2021 · Hi. After After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. This change has occurred I've published in medical journals, in physics/engineering journals and in neuroscience ones. As far as I know, Mar 28, 2015 · AE stands for "Associate Editor. However, the editor has sent out another review invitation (#5 Reviewer). Nov 19, 2020 · I submitted an article to a ScholarOne journal. This change has occurred I had a manuscript that was rejected after "minor revision. After submitting the revised article for a week, a ADM was assigned and the status has changed to "awaiting reviewer invitation. June 2, 2023, major revision. After agreeing to review a manuscript, external reviewers are typically granted 28 days to complete the assignment. The second one gave a more thorough review, raised some good questions, and said the general idea is good, but made no comment about whether the article should be published or not. This change has occurred Awaiting recommendations: waiting for an editor to make a recommendation Recommendation can be "get another review" so it goes back to the review cycle. 26, awaiting reviewer scores. My question is how did it happen after minor revisions? From the start the 3rd reviewer was highly rejective while the first two positive. That's cheating, as the assignment was to make his own ravioli. . I revised the paper accordingly and addressed the feedbacks. 6 Awaiting Reviewer Scores 6. I am afraid that after this long period, the editor will reject the manuscript. Nov 7, 2020 · Four months after submitting my research paper, I was asked for a major revision. After the 3rd send back with the same comments, I drug in my CI to get his opinion. It was perhaps a minor revision or not a very extensive major revision. Is this normal? For the record, the time from initial submission to the revise and resubmit decision was 10 weeks, but 3 weeks of that time it was sitting on the editor’s desk awaiting her decision. Should I Feb 28, 2021 · My paper underwent a revision. Thus, seemingly, the review process ended only for a second one to be initiated by the EA just days later. When I asked about my status, the editorial manager said that the handling editor is still assessing whether they would send my manuscript for review. In the first notification, I got a major revision. ' What does this change indicate? Does this indicate a rejection from the editor? Mar 15, 2016 · A rejected paper is sometimes resubmitted to the same journal, after some revisions. The paper goes into official review; one reviewer is extremely critical (I suspect rejection or major revision), the other reviewer is very positive with a few helpful comments and criticisms(I suspect major or minor revision). To be honest, I don't even want to make any more changes, submitting is too frustrating. What’s the deal with this? Aug 25, 2020 · Hi. g. It's impossible to make a generalization across all journals and all specialties. " I think my manuscript entered a time loop. I suppose that in most cases of minor revision, the revised manuscript will only be reviewed by the ADM or associate editor. I have revised the manuscript two times: the first major revision and the second minor revision. So, perhaps the AE believes they can check the manuscript on their own. Once enough reviewers have been selected, the manuscript will move on to the next stage. I am curious as to why the status of the manuscript regularly changes between 'awaiting reviewer selection' and 'awaiting reviewer assignment'. After about a month, the status switched from "Awaiting Reviewer Scores" to "Awaiting recommendation". The status of the paper changed several times. Nov 12, 2020 · Because "reviewer10" is written, I would assume that the paper was reviewed by at least 6 reviewers. Is switching a reviewer after minor revision common? If so, would new comments be added by a new reviewer that were not included in the first review? Editor of a journal asked for "Major Revision" for a submitted paper, after submitting revised paper it went for the review, after that the status shows "with Editor" for some time. The decision was major revision. So how am I getting "rejected" because of one bad review out of 10? Even if it is a major revision, the due date is 24 November, which is 13 days ahead, quite bizarre for a "major revision". How should this double status be interpreted? Is the revised manuscript with the editor or reviewers, or both? Oct 24, 2018 · I just submitted a revised paper to ScholarOne (major revision). In this case 15 days is plenty of time to ask for a status update. It is just guessing. I know the next stage is to Editor In chief. Or (in one system I know of), that the editor has not assigned the necessary number of reviewers. Back in July, I submitted a paper for Springer's Machine Learning. It is indeed not rare to get desk rejection after several weeks. Jun 9, 2021 · The paper was accepted with minor revision (two reviewers both recommended 'minor revision'). If the editor and reviewer 1 are not negative, you have good chances. Handling the R&R is important. I remember the first time I got a major revision I sort of panicked too, but from my experience this is totally unnecessary! So congratulations, enjoy the moment and, go make that rebuttal! I have submitted the paper on 31st January 2021. Has anyone had this experience If the status of the manuscript is shown as "With Editor", the manuscript is either awaiting in- house evaluation or is awaiting the assignment of reviewers. If the paper is not rejected, there are three possible recommendations: “accept (as is)”, “minor revision”, and “major revision”. 21, awaiting AE decision. There is something of an air of mystery as to what actually happens to your manuscript once yo Aug 9, 2022 · After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. You do not need to do anything at this time. Anyone who knows me, even just professionally or as an acquaintance, will recognize it as me. – In contrast, if in this journal the peer-review typically takes several months, then it might be long desk-rejection. While the differences in average review time between one field and another are staggering (one month for the Whole process in neuroscience, 8 months in engineering), usually it's something like you don't even see the choice of the editor and maybe it's 3-4 days between when it gets to the editor and After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. So, why has it returned to the referee(s) after last week's status? Jun 24, 2023 · After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. 对于论文小修后出现"awaiting reviewer assignment"的情况，通常并不会直接返回给原来的审稿人来审稿。 原因有以下几点：1. In the month of December, I got a "reject and resubmit" decision. This change has occurred Sep 6, 2021 · A major revision was submitted to a journal. Finally, the status now is awaiting final decision since a week. Still this step is usually faster because the reviewers don't have to be "re-identified" (assuming they agree to review; otherwise it could take longer for a myriad of reasons). After a few days, the status changed to "Awaiting Review Scores". 18 Awaiting AE Recommendation 6. true. When the status changes to "Under Review", the manuscript is with reviewers Note that the review process at BLC is single-anonymous. This change has occurred Dec 12, 2019 · I submitted my manuscript to a journal. " Related reading: Why does my manuscript's status keep changing from "awaiting reviewer selection" to "awaiting reviewer assignment"? The manuscript was sent back to the reviewers as it was a major revision. At first, the status showed "awaiting AE recommendation". The review process is fast, hoping for a good result. Both reviews were positive about the future of the article. Jul 18, 2019 · I have made a major revision after receiving one very positive feedback and one very negative feedback for my manuscript. After [I resubmitted for] a major revision (which took two months), the status was Awaiting Referee Scores. After I resubmit, including responses to the editors' review. Common Reasons for Getting A “Major Revision” Decision. [email protected] Submitted my paper. Also, keep in mind rejection rate without review in your journal. This change has occurred Feb 26, 2021 · I have submitted a manuscript to a ScholarOne journal. I submitted the paper after the revision. Now I am curious about what this might mean. What type of major revisions did you get? is like repeating some experiments or writing a new section. He agreed with me and reached out to the capstone evaluators and it got escalated to the lead for approval. Last week, the status changed to Awaiting AE Recommendation. Is that the only reason the date changes? I have heard that if the editor accesses the reviewers coments and when a reviewer send his comments the date changes also. However, I just noticed that the status of my revised manuscript Nov 16, 2015 · Scenario 1: with editor/under editor evaluation >> awaiting reviewer selection >> under review If this is how the status had changed the first time you submitted the paper, then chances are that your paper is actually being sent for a re-review. Hello everyone, so my research paper was reviewed with a request for 'major revision' (Q1 journal, related to biomedical engineering). For "good" business journals the rejection rate is something like: 30% desk rejected by the editor before going to review, 40-60% rejected in the first round of review, 10-20% rejected in subsequent rounds of review, only 5-10% papers submitted are actually published. As a result of this, you may receive a further round of comments from the same reviewers. Outright acceptance of a journal paper is rare. Last week I sent a gentle reminder to the editor and got no response. The current status of the manuscript is ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ and has not changed for a month now. ""Awaiting AE recommendation" status means that the AE has collected all reviews from the reviewers who were assigned to review your manuscript and that the AE's decision for acceptance is pending. But in general, revise and resubmit with major revisions means that there are substantial changes that need to be made and you need to go to all possible lengths to satisfy the reviewers' comments. 2022/10/13 submit, Awaiting AE Assignment 2022/10/17 Status: Awaiting Reviewer Selection 2022/11/4 Status: Under review 2023/2/12 Status: Major Revision 2023/3/27 Major revision submission, Status: Awaiting Reviewer Invitation 2023/3/19 Status: Under review 2023/5/26 Status: Accept The review process took a long time, a total of 225 days, but Apr 21, 2017 · Review complete: This is the largest variance part because some reviewers agree to review but don’t actually submit one, some reviewers decline, some reviewers never respond to the invitation, and so on. Despite this, the comments were positive and the changes were doable. I have already addressed 4 peer-reviewers, and in my last submission I addressed the comments of the 4th reviewer. The status after 3 days . This change has occurred After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. May I know is there any chances for at least to get a major revision. 'Major revisions' is one of the most common peer review decisions. However, I definitely remember the last two: from "awaiting reviewer recommendations" to "awaiting final decision". I find "awaiting reviewer invitation" to be a slightly strange phrase, but taken at face value it seems to mean that they still have not even asked anyone to referee the paper, let alone found a referee, let alone gotten the report back from a referee! r/academia • I am an academic who participated in a study and found my (very) identifying information in a PhD student's paper. The first time I contacted was when a whole year was passed without even a single response. 28 Major Revision 8. The status has not changed to ‘Under review’. Major revisions are not a rejection. My personal definition of major-revisions as a reviewer is that I'm asking the author to do additional experiments or analysis, but if they do that work, the paper is suitable for publication. Now what I got is the 3rd reviewers comments only while others suggested publication. I am really confused, can I contact the journal to explain this or should I just wait? I think of a major revision as one that involves substantial changes to the manuscript. So, please give me advice. However, today, it changed back to Awaiting Referee Scores. Now for the last 2 weeks, it's showing awaiting EIC. 9 Awaiting AE Recommendation 11. You can usually get things moving by sending a friendly follow up — I got one pushed through this way a month ago after it was “awaiting editor assignment” for 2 months. During reject and resubmit, I got comments from 2 reviewers, and My journal submission status is still “awaiting reviewer selection” after nearly 3 months. The editor seemed enthusiastic about the paper, and asked for the revisions before acceptance. In my field, "major revision" means do the work and we'll decide if it's good enough, including possibly sending to new reviewers, and there's a very good chance it could still be rejected. But "minor revision" means "if you do the listed revisions, and they don't meaningfully change the content of the paper, it'll be accepted". The manuscript is likely to be accepted after authors address requests for revision that do not involve major re-working of the data analysis and presentation or of the organization and text of the manuscript. I don't think anyone should be embarrassed by a negative review, and it is quite common that everyone is bound to run into a negative reviewer (usually it's reviewer #2) at some point. 25 Minor Revision 11. I took this to mean that the paper has passed the desk review, since the editor is selecting reviewers. ’ I don't understand whether this means my paper has been accepted or not? 2023. authors may see the status “Awaiting EIC Assignment”. Scenario 2: awaiting reviewer selection>> under review If this was the way the status had changed I just got a major revision request and the feedback seems pretty straightforward to address. I have submitted a manuscript to a reputed journal. When I am the reviewer and ask for major revisions I usually want to see substantial changes. It sounded like their "under review" meant basically "Under Editor's Review". 31 Awaiting Reviewer Assignment 6. Sometimes after reading the second time, reviewers may have a better understanding of the paper. 20220810 Awaiting Reviewer Assignment - Waiting for reviewer assignment on August 10, 2022. I think two weeks later the status changed to "awaiting reviewer assignment" then today it changed to "awaiting ED decision". Sep 12, 2022 · Does it happen that the editor asks the reviewers to re-review a paper? For about 10 days or so it has been "awaiting final decision" after a few months of under review and then awaiting reviewers scores. The article is quite technical and multidisciplinary, so I understand that finding reviewers is hard. Jan 31, 2024 · "Awaiting recommendation" means the manuscript's peer review process has been completed, and the handling editor has sent such manuscript to the chief editor to decide whether After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. I have submitted an article to a JCR-indexed journal in November and in March, following the request of the journal, I submitted a revised version that contained changes to the introduction and literature review. This has happened several times. 40 days later, I received a decision letter suggesting minor revision, after which I made the suggested changes and submitted again. " What was odd was that the two reviewers for the second round did not talk about my revision at all, but treated the manuscript as a new submission. Reviewer Assignment: The status "awaiting reviewer assignment" indicates that the editorial team is in the process of selecting and assigning new reviewers to evaluate your revised Nov 19, 2020 · After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. 6. So I thought it passed the associate editor's evaluation and now they were looking for reviewers. Know what the reviewers have asked you to do. Two of the three reviewer completed their reviews within a week whereas the third one has taken about 2 months but still has not submitted his/her report which makes me think that this reviewer could be a new one. This change has occurred Jan 16, 2018 · As a reviewer I appreciate if the authors simply copy the reviewer comments and answer each and every of them while also helpfully pointing out related changes to the manuscript. " Then it changed to "Awaiting reviewer assignment" What does it mean? Will my paper be reviewed again? I submitted a manuscript that went through the entire peer review process. It means that the peer reviewer considers a manuscript suitable for publication if the authors rectify some major shortcomings. From my own experience I once reveiced in a row major revision, minor revision, major revision. A few days ago, it was changed to "awaiting reviewer selection". After the review scores come back, a manuscript then After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. The EiC at that time said they'll look • Assign Reviewers: Manuscripts awaiting responses from invited reviewers. 30 submit 5. As a peer reviewer, it is useful to learn about common reasons for a 'major revision' verdict. Most journals will try to catch this and either reject outright, or assign it to the same AE to handle. Nov 21, 2022 · After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. This is the first stage of the peer-review process and your manuscript will be here until the assigned Editor has selected some suitable experts to invite to review. Pretty much the best outcome one can hope for in my field (biomedical science) when submitting to a decently high IF journal, I think? Do most of the post peer review rejections with these journals come after the first round of review? With a typical ScholarOne configuration, "Awaiting Reviewer Scores" means that it is actually out with (at least some) reviewers, while "Under Review" would instead mean the previous stage, where it is being considered by the handling editor(s) and might still be rejected without review. Also, the second round took 8 months. This can include conducting new data analysis or experiments, overhauling or substantially reframing the literature review or discussion section, or integrating a substantial amount of new background research. Even yesterday the status was still "awaiting reviewer selection", but today it was changed to "awaiting EIC decision". It was, thankfully, no sweat to handle. I recently submitted my first academic article for publication and received peer reviewer comments asking for a major revision. If it is low, then it more likely to be already after review. 12. The status changed to awaiting reviewer selection, and then changed to awaiting reviewer scores. Reviewer 2 is usually a grad student who was given the assignment by their PI and has a bone to pick with the editorial process. The journal where I’m an AE got rid of the major revisions category a couple years back after a nasty fight with an author. An R&R even with major revisions and a negative review means the paper is at least good enough to consider publishing. Admin Dashboard （管理者ダッシュボード）に表示される査読プロセス中の論文ステータスは以下の通りです。 Feb 17, 2021 · Later, it has been under "Awaiting review scores" for the past 25 days. Can you confirm? Edit: in my case, it is for a revised paper. After some days, the status changed to 'awaiting reviewer scores', but there is also the status 'awaiting decision' right next to it. We are experiencing a high volume of applications. Once the review invitations are sent, the status changes to "Reviewers invited. 28 Awaiting EA Decision 6. And from the past few days, I see it as "Awaiting AE recommendation". Then a few days later it switched back to "Awaiting referee assignment" again. Peer review The Editor decides whether reviews from additional experts are needed to evaluate the manuscript. Try to approach the process as someone who is trying to get better science published. Yeah just send the journal a message. blogspot. Since 7/27 the status of my manuscript is awaiting reviewer invitation. Any thoughts? Aug 16, 2024 · After a month, I received major reviews, made the necessary revisions, and resubmitted the manuscript. Do I just keep waiting, send another email? What should I do with this frustrating May 6, 2021 · The paper was accepted with minor revision (two reviewers both recommended 'minor revision'). But again it all depends upon the type of revision EDIT: Well now it jumped back to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment. Your case is awaiting review. None of them made a negative comment. Recommendation can also be "get reviewer to clarify" so it goes back to the review cycle. Now what? Feb 18, 2022 | Scholarly publishing. Since then it has been 4 months and the paper is still 'awaiting reviewer invitation'. Once the requisite number of reviewers (generally 2 to 3) accept the invitation, the status changes to "Awaiting reviewer scores" which is the equivalent of "Under review. If we need any information from you, we will mail you a request for evidence at your current address on file with USCIS. I have contacted the editor in chief (EiC) a few times regarding this. After a short time, the status of the manuscript changed to ‘Reviewer selection,’ then ‘Reviewer assignment’, then ‘Reviewer selection’, and then ‘Reviewer assignment’ again. But if you in a restaurant and someone uses shop-bought pastry, nobody would have any problem with that so long as the final product tasted good. According to the publishing office, they can’t find a reviewer. Editorial decisions The decision on a manuscript is made by 10. This change has occurred Sep 11, 2017 · In this stage, the editor identifies a few reviewers for your paper and sends out email invitations to them. Major Revision: The manuscript may be accepted with major revisions. The EiC at that time said they'll look It's different for every journal. 12, awaiting reviewer selection. Apr 27, 2017 · I recently submitted my first paper to a philosophy journal. Jun 9, 2023 · After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. After almost three weeks of being in Awaiting Reviewer Assignment, the status has changed to Awaiting Reviewer Selection. Okay, it has been sent for review again. My personal guideline was to invite new reviewers if the previous reviewer had gone seven days without answering the invitation. And I am sure neither of them was the initial reviewer. Jun 16, 2020 · Coming to your query, what ‘Editorial assignment pending’ at this stage means is that your revised manuscript is awaiting a review by an associate editor (AE). 8 Awaiting Reviewer Assignment 11. Reviewer 1 recommended acceptance with minor revisions and Reviewer 2 wanted major revisions before considering it further. Then, the status of the paper changed to ‘In copy editing. co. Once the required number of reviewers accept the review invitation, the status changes to "Under review. Sometimes the handling administrator or editor are on holiday or busy. July 5, 2023, minor revision. uk has a great post or two about why review can take so long Feb 14, 2023 · After a week of submission, the status changed to "awaiting reviewer selections". It’ll take work and a second revision after this one most likely, but I’m confident we will get it done. Feb 18, 2022 · Awaiting Reviewer Selection. By November it showed awaiting EIC decision. 9, awaiting reviewer assignment. academicjournalpublishing. Aug 31, 2019 · After revision and resubmision, my manuscript status was "Awaiting AE recommendation. , by answering them with "corrected"). I submitted a manuscript to a Sage Journal almost 50 days ago. Jul 23, 2021 · After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. If they do reject it without review, that week delay the paper was probably on the AE's to-do list. The paper status is still "awaiting reviewer assignment". After submitting the revision it goes through (awaiting for reviewer selection -> awaiting for reviewer scores -> awaiting for editors decision -> Awaiting EIC Decision). t backed up) waiting to be sent to some reviews. I am not My paper has been submitted for more than 15 months in one of the IEEE transactions. Although I understand this isn’t a long period of time in the grand scheme, for the past two months the paper’s status has cyclically changed from “awaiting reviewer assignment” to “awaiting reviewer selection”. As per my understanding, the status should be Awaiting EIC Decision. 20 Major Revision 12. 30 TE verifies reviewer comments Nov 13, 2016 · One of my manuscript was submitted to a journal in one year and four months ago, and after two rounds of reviews, its status was changed to "Awaiting EIC Decision" two weeks ago. Is it possible to get a desk reject after the "awaiting reviewer selection" stage? Mar 13, 2022 · If the editorial management system (EMS) is distinguishing between the two, odds are "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" means the reviewers have not been invited yet, and "Awaiting Reviewer Confirmation" means the reviewers have not agreed to review the manuscript yet. " This status has not been changed for a month. I agreed with what they were asking, so I made the changes and resubmitted. 141 votes, 91 comments. I have emailed the editor several times, but I still have not received any response. Aug 12, 2019 · I have resubmitted a paper which was revised which needed minor revisions, but the status remains “Awaiting Reviewer Assignment” for 5 weeks. Interestingly, it is/was awaiting "reviewer" (not reviewers- in a plural form) recommendations. I submit my comments I have submitted a paper to an Elsevier journal and have already gone through 4 rounds of peer review and the editors have suggested a major revision each time. All happened in like 5hrs, was told to resubmit and notate that it was for the lead to review. What do I do? So as the title says, I am in “awaiting reviewer selection” status in a mid-tier education journal, and it has been nearly 3 months like that. 6. Both of my… I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again I checked the link again after 3 days and I noticed that the date has changed to 19th of April (check the attached image) with the same status of "Review Complete". same "review complete" status but different date. Nov 12, 2018 · The status "Awaiting reviewer assignment" indicates that the editor has sent out reviewer invitations. 26 Awaiting Editorial Jun 26, 2020 · I downvoted this answer because by far the most time consuming step is the peer review itself, and "awaiting AE assignment" is a sign that review has not started yet. However, after a few days, I got a desk reject notification. After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. This means that while the manuscript cleared the desk screening and was deemed good to go for peer review, the journal is finding it somewhat challenging to identify the right peer reviewers for your paper. That's all really good advice. This change has occurred Sep 20, 2017 · It typically means that the paper has been received, has been put in the work queue of the editor, but the editor has not assigned reviewers. Nov 30, 2020 · The manuscript being stuck at Awaiting Reviewer Assignment for a month is not uncommon. At my journal we ask our AE's to make the initial decision (select reviewers or decline without review) within a week of being assigned a paper, but it often takes longer. There is something of an air of mystery as to what actually happens to your manuscript once yo Feb 15, 2023 · Since then, the article has been jumping between "Waiting for Reviewer Assignment" and "Contacting Potential Reviewers" (10 changes of status now). They had major revisions, reanalyzed the data per the reviewers’ request. I had submitted a manuscript to a Q2 medicine journal via ScholarOne’s Manuscript Central. Furthermore, you can get inspired by sample peer May 30, 2020 · My manuscript status in the ScholarOne submission system remained 'Awaiting Reviewer Assignment' for three months and then changed to 'Under Review. Now in February, 2022, I resumitted the manuscript. This change has occurred If the date changes and it’s still under review means that less than two accepted and others have been invited. Personally, I'd even address referee comments that point out typos (e. I’ve also had the “here’s a major revision, but f*** you if you can actually complete the work” long shot type of major revisions. This is a placeholder queue that does not require check these manuscripts periodically • Awaiting Reviewer Scores: Manuscripts where reviewers have agreed to review, but have not submitted their review Overdue Reviewer Scores: Manuscripts where Major Revision is great news! Pretty much everybody in the labs that I work in has major/minor revisions. But my question is as below. The most common reason for a manuscript to receive a major revision decision is that, while the topic is of interest and relevant to readers of the journal, the editors are unable to determine, from the existing version of the paper, whether the quality is sufficient for dissemination. When you have submitted your paper or case study, up to three experts in the field will review it to provide validation, quality control and added value to you in the form of constructive feedback. 20, awaiting reviewer scores, should be under review. I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again The article has been returned to reviewers after a major-revisions decision every time in my experience, both as an author and a reviewer. After one day of submission, status was ‘Awaiting Decision’; but now after 10 days, status change into ‘Awaiting reviewer selection’. We’re in a field where the specifics of how data were analyzed can make a huge difference to the conclusions. " Jul 1, 2017 · After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. It got past the editor phase and switched to 'Reviewer Assignment Pending', being stuck in that ever since I've contacted the journal twice and got the same response, that it is still awaiting reviewers and that I'll be notified once an update happens. I can't find the exact average time but for most papers, it took two to three months between submitted, revised, and accepted status. If the previous editorial decision was C (revise & re-review) or D (major revisions & re-review), the paper will be sent for re-review to the original reviewers, together with your responses. Peer review scores have been sent to the editor and the status is awaiting editor decision for almost 4 weeks now. Posted by u/Mountain-Ad-4557 - 17 votes and 29 comments Mar 16, 2022 · I submitted manuscript in October, 2021. Then I revised and resubmitted the paper. irkrziwmbohgutugdmkxssleanahgxldfhksgjregcdugcqq